The campaign had plenty detractors, and Trump himself could not resist regulation of his own, in antitrust, trade, social media and other areas that wiped out savings. 13,771 established Trump’s “one-in, two-out” regulatory campaign more than any aspect, it characterized his approach to the administrative state over four years as the spear point of a program aimed at freezing and rolling back regulatory costs on the public. Let’s run through a couple of Biden’s “Revocation” orders and their implications.įoremost in getting the Biden axe was Trump’s FebruExecutive Order 13,771, “ Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Cost.”Į.O. First, the premise is that government regulation is better for the economy in a downturn than the relaxation of it and the pursuit of resilience and growth and second, that it is OK to resurrect the Obama-era “pen and phone” to make law to advance progressive goals, despite that job properly resting with Congress. That alone is a significant philosophical stance. Biden vowed to revoke what he called Trump’s "harmful policies and directives that threaten to frustrate the Federal Government’s ability to confront these problems.” His order accordingly “empowers agencies to use appropriate regulatory tools to achieve these goals." Never mind that federal regulation is already the least disciplined part of what the federal government does, and that remained true under Trump.
0 kommentar(er)
